Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Status: 
Status
colourGreen
titleLIVE

Performance Review Protocol

Career Preview Philosophy

  • Everything is a dialogue.

  • Give the employee an opportunity to speak. Do they agree with the feedback? Do they have career goals? Are there things getting in the way of their performance that are out of their control?

  • It should be in +6mo and +regular intervals (at most +12mo intervals). Based off when the team member joined (not the calendar year).

  • The superior Lead(s) must come prepared with notes that include the following. Adhere to this template to ensure that we have continuity across team members.

  • Feedback

    • Things done above and beyond the call of duty

    • Things done well, as expected of the job. "good job" comments

    • Things that can be improved. But aren't a problem. This is constructive mentoring.

    • Things that are a problem and need to be improved.

  • Promotion/demotion details

    . See Career Preview - Information for Leads.

  • Compensation changes are discussed during the Career Preview (if needed), including: role changes, salary, title, key dates and conditions

    .

    All points need to be discussed with the report. .

  • Give the report opportunity to speak. Do they have career goals? Are there things getting in the way of their performance?

  • The superior The Lead(s) must record meeting notes that cover all discussion topics. Not only action points.

  • Both parties can end up with action points.

  • Transparency is important. There should be no sidenotes that the superior has, but the report hasn't.Superior must send complete notes to report afterwards. Report must return a signed copyLead has separately that aren’t reflected in the Career Preview notes.

  • Unlike 1::1s, performance reviews are not confidential. They are shared with the Management team.Give a heads up. Anticipating a performance review can be stressful. As the superior, give an indication of whether it's all-great, mostly-great, or not-that-good, so that your report can prepare emotionallyAll Leads Team.

  • In cases of roles with dual-superiors (Engineer, PM, QA), you multiple Leads (e.g. Engineers), the Leads are jointly responsible so work as a team to prepare and give do the performance review.

  • If there is a promotion/demotion involved, get it ratified before the performance review so that you can present a holistic picture.

  • Performance reviews shouldn't feel like a dominance ritual. It's really about helping develop people's abilities (accelerating career progressions), ensuring people and roles are well matched, and keeping our skill/compenatation compensation matrix fair as people's abilities and roles change.

  • Be very cautious of the Peter Principle when it comes to people who . Sometimes people may have been promoted into a role that they are not effective at and/or have failed to grow intofor whatever reason. This is tough, but in such cases, try to find alternative roles.

Owner

User Profile
user557058:4ade9f24-74f4-453e-9d2c-2c1e9bb8e95b5d6cdc64dc6e480dbc01eb8f

Reviewer

User Profile
user557058:9f438a634ade9f24-baef74f4-4327453e-ab1f9d2c-2e5135a69e092c1e9bb8e95b